IOC-MIPS_130a |
|
|
10450C,10460C |
Title: |
|
24 mm and 70 mm array geometries and scan mirror vectors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objective: |
|
To measure the pixel sizes and the relative locations ( i.e., array orientation, scale and distortion) as a function of scan mirror angle. |
|
|
|
|
|
Description: |
|
Place a bright star near one corner of the array and operate the scan mirror to cover the entire array in 1/2 (TBR) pixel steps. |
|
|
|
The scan mirror and S/C should then be offset to place the star near the other corner of the array and the procedure repeated. |
|
|
|
The whole process should be repeated for redundancy. |
|
|
|
|
|
Place in Schedule: |
|
After dust cover off |
|
|
|
|
|
Required Conditions: |
|
S/C pointing understood to <10" (TBR); offsetting to <0.5" and stable to 0.5" in 500 sec (TBR) |
|
|
|
After CTA/instrument cool down to a level where bright stars can be seen: |
|
|
|
For 24um, bakground must be less than 4.0e-10 W/cm^2/sr (< 37 K). |
|
|
|
For 70um, background must be less than 1.2e-10 W/m^2/sr (< 16 K). |
|
|
|
Need bright star in the OPZ. |
|
|
|
|
|
Resources: |
|
|
|
|
duration (best estimate) |
|
3 sec/pt * 2 Npixel pts/scan * 4 scans * 1.5 (for efficiency) = 38, 19 & 19 min at 24, 70, & 70 mm = 1.3 hr total.
|
|
real time downlink |
|
No |
|
special post event actions |
|
No |
|
|
|
|
Outcome: |
|
|
|
|
description |
|
Maps of the pixel locations as a function of scan mirror angle. |
|
can proceed in parallel with other activity |
|
No, dedicated observing. |
|
must outcome be confirmed before next event / test /activity |
|
No |
|
method of confirmation (sensor TLM, data analysis, etc.) |
|
Data analysis |
|
estimate of data turn around if required for confirmation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unique or included in planned uplink or downlink/analysis tool |
|
|
Specialized IET and data analysis |
|
|
|
|
Contingency Plan: |
|
Repeat with different stars, integrating longer, using more S/C offsets. |
|
|
|
|
|
IOC Critical |
|
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
References: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Template last updated: |
|
9/14/99; J. Keene |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
Ultimately we would like to measure the field to 1/4 pixel accuracy. This would increase the time necessary by x 2. |
|
|
|
This can probably be done after IOC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|