IOC-MIPS_210a |
|
|
10530C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
Characterize MIPS Latent Images and Saturated Source Behavior at 70 and 160um |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objective: |
|
Understand the consequences of observing very bright sources with MIPS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description: |
|
|
Observations corresponding to 50%, 100%, and 500% of full well will be taken. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
including flow / state diagram |
|
|
These saturation levels will be achieved through a combination of source selection and exposure times. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 1: |
Saturation and latent image behavior of the 70um array. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At each of three signal levels: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observe a source using a 4x4 dither pattern using 10 second exposures. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Execute a thermal anneal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part 2: |
Saturation and latent image behavior of the 160um array. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At each of three signal levels: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observe a source at 6 positions on the array using 10 second exposures. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Execute a thermal anneal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place in Schedule: |
|
|
After aperture cover is opened. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(relative to water shed events) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required Conditions: |
|
|
MIPS apertures must have been located. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Detector aliveness and electronics checkouts must have been performed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the 160um array, the background must be less than 1e-8 W/m^2/sr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or T<6.5K |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
duration (best estimate) |
|
|
|
|
40 min |
|
|
|
|
real time downlink (Y / N) |
|
|
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
special post event actions (Y / N) |
|
|
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
Generates 64 DCEs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
description |
|
|
|
|
After this test the consequences of observing very |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bright sources will be understood. |
|
|
|
|
can proceed in parallel with other activity |
|
|
|
|
No, requires dedicated pointing. |
|
|
|
|
must outcome be confirmed before next event / test /activity |
|
|
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
method of confirmation (sensor TLM, data analysis, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
data analysis |
|
|
|
|
estimate of data turn around if required for confirmation |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unique or included in planned AOT? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uses photometry AOT and IETs for anneals and flush cycles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingency Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"What if..." |
|
|
If unusually large effects are observed, more detailed study of anneal/flush cycles will be needed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IOC Critical |
|
|
Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
References: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Template last updated: |
|
|
9/6/99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Rieke |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|