IOC Campaign J review CAID TITLE TIME TIME AOR/IER COOKBOOK ALLOC USED PRESENT COMPLETE mips-905 Start-up activities, Si and Ge 35 40 yes prelim mips-912 IOC Darks, 160um 15 16.5 yes yes mips-911 IOC Darks, 70um 30 32.55 yes yes mips-910 IOC Darks, 24um 15 10.2 yes yes mips-914 24um Flat - routine, Scan AOR 13 14.3 yes prelim mips-917 24um Flat - routine, Phot AOR 10 11.5 yes prelim mips-916 160um IC - routine, Scan AOR 13 12.7 yes prelim mips-919 160um IC - routine, Phot AOR 21 21.7 yes prelim mips-915 70um IC - routine, Scan AOR 13 12.7 yes prelim mips-918 70um IC - routine, Phot AOR 21 21.8 yes prelim mips-313 70um NF Illumination correction 19 18.45 yes prelim PCS-105 Periodic PCRS/STA alignment filter updates 12 mips-930 Ge Anneal and recovery 12 6.3 prelim prelim mips-924 160um Flux standards 20 11.2 yes yes mips_ier IER to set 160 stim level to 0x2E 0 0 DELETED mips-601 160um Stim and star calibration 7 0 yes DELETED mips_ier IER to set 160 stim level to 0x33 0 0 DELETED mips-601 160um Stim and star calibration 7 0 yes DELETED mips_ier IER to set 160 stim level to 0x3C 0 0 DELETED mips-601 160um Stim and star calibration 7 0 yes DELETED mips_ier IER to reset 160um stim level to 0x37 0 0 DELETED mips-922 70um Flux standards 12 6.6 yes yes mips_ier IER to set 70um stim level to 0x22 0 0 DELETED mips-600 Flux nonlinearity cal, Ge, 0.1 10 16.35 yes yes mips_ier IER to set 70um stim level to 0x2A 0 0 DELETED mips-600 Flux nonlinearity cal, Ge, 0.25 10 16.35 yes yes mips_ier IER to set 70um stim level to 0x34 0 0 DELETED mips-600 Flux nonlinearity cal, Ge, 0.5 10 16.35 yes yes mips-600 Flux nonlinearity cal, Ge, 0.75 0 16.35 yes yes mips_ier IER to reset 70um stim level to 0x2F 0 0 DELETED mips-920 Routine 24um Flux standard 11 8.2 yes yes mips-137 70um NF Focal plane survey (coarse) 130 163.95 prelim prelim mips-930 Ge Anneal and recovery 12 6.3 prelim prelim mips-234 160 Array location and orientation 152 144.35 prelim prelim mips-139 SED Slit location and orientation 108 75.1 prelim prelim mips-961 70um WF Frame table update sanity check 8 10 prelim no PCS-105 Periodic PCRS/STA alignment filter updates 12 PCS-055 Periodic IRU Calibration updates 36 mips-930 Ge Anneal and recovery 12 6.3 prelim prelim mips-924 160um Flux standards 20 11.2 yes yes mips_ier IER to set 160 stim level to 0x2E 0 0 DELETED mips-601 160um Stim and star calibration 7 0 yes DELETED mips_ier IER to set 160 stim level to 0x33 0 0 DELETED mips-601 160um Stim and star calibration 7 0 yes DELETED mips_ier IER to set 160 stim level to 0x3C 0 0 DELETED mips-601 160um Stim and star calibration 7 0 yes DELETED mips_ier IER to reset 160um stim level to 0x37 0 0 DELETED mips-922 70um Flux standards 12 6.6 yes yes mips_ier IER to set 70um stim level to 0x22 0 0 DELETED mips-600 Flux nonlinearity cal, Ge, 1.0 10 15.65 yes yes mips_ier IER to set 70um stim level to 0x2A 0 0 DELETED mips-600 Flux nonlinearity cal, Ge, 1.5 10 16.35 yes yes mips_ier IER to set 70um stim level to 0x34 0 0 DELETED mips-600 Flux nonlinearity cal, Ge, 2.0 10 16.35 yes yes mips-600 Flux nonlinearity cal, Ge, 4.0 0 16.35 yes yes mips_ier IER to reset 70um stim level to 0x2F 0 0 DELETED mips-992 Shutdown activities, Ge and Si 19 23 yes prelim total 835 821.6 margin 99 campaign reserve 600 Campaign scheduling notes: There are two primary activities in this campaign. One is a very thorough investigation of calibration using standard activities, the other is a set of focal plane surveys. For the calibration tasks, I used the standard startup sequence as much as possible. I put the Phot versions of the 24um flat, 70um IC, and 160um IC in sequence right after the Scan versions of each task. This maximizes efficiency and provides the best comparison between the two techniques. The extra time required is not that large, so the timing of the calibration activities is not altered much compared to the standard startup. After the first anneal, I broke from the usual startup sequence by running the set of MIPS-601 tasks immediately after MIPS-924. I jumped from there to MIPS-922, postponing MIPS-920 until later. This puts MIPS-922 at very nearly the usual timing after the thermal anneal. Both of these Ge calibration sequences are completed before much cosmic ray damage has accumulated. The next task is the 24um flux standard. This is very different timing from the usual startup sequence, but that should not be an issue at 24um this long after the initial powerup. The 70um NF FPS was placed next, partly because the pointing is likely to be similar to that of the flux standards but mostly because it fit nicely into the available time. This task is run between 2-4h after the thermal anneal, which is very good timing. The task starts about 5h after startup, which ought to be sufficient to reach temperature stability. A thermal anneal prepares the 160um array for MIPS-234. This task is long enough that it really needed to be run right after a thermal anneal. The SED slit location task will have similar pointing and will work well between 3-4.5h after the anneal. The frame table update comes next and was placed here to avoid interfering with any of the other calibration activities. The campaign ends with a repeat of the Ge flux standard calibration activities, starting with a thermal anneal and following the same sequence as was used earlier. This cycle of calibration tasks starts about 7.5h after the start of the first set, so we have a decent timeline for looking for changes. Comments on the campaign as a whole: Karl G. melded task mips-601 into mips-600. I need to redo the campaign structure to include this change. He eliminated the whole stability check portion of the test so the mips-600 tasks can probably be all put in sequence now. Almudena has a lot of flatfielding tasks in this campaign. They have a 24-48h turnaround time, and the results are needed for the analysis of other tasks. She should get help from team germanium and team silicon so that we can turn these data around quickly. She identifies Dave F and Eiichi as data monkeys for the Ge tasks, Casey and Susan for the Si. It would be a good idea to check priorities of the dependent tasks so that she can prioritize her analysis. I don't see any critical 24um tasks, so the Ge analysis should come first. We do lots of calibration tasks in this campaign. Chad needs the darks, flats, and ICs for his flux calibration. Jocelyn needs the Ge darks and ICs for her FPS tasks. Since they are needed for the FPS analysis, we need quick turnaround on the Ge calibration tasks. Comments on individual tasks: mips-912: We only measure 10s darks with 5s resets. When do we determine whether those darks are adequate or if we also need 3s and 4s darks? Do we have enough margin to do the fancier darks? Do we have an IER prepared that would give us the complete set of darks? The cookbook should include a link to the ground-based read noise test results. Will we do any measurements to determine the scattered light levels in the darks? If we do it right, that will come from the scattered background monitor, mips-950. mips-911: As with mips-912, will the 10s darks be adequate? The IER has us doing 70dark1 RN, 70dark2 RN, 70dark1 DarkCur, 70dark2 DarkCur. Is this the right order? We will have big sky latents that might be worse than the stim latents. Do we need any pauses before starting the read noise measurement? Would we be better off doing 70dark1 dark, 70dark1 RN, 70dark2 dark, 70dark2 RN? mips-080, the 70um dark position test, doesn't happen until campaign O. Is that soon enough? What will we do if these dark measurements are inadequate? I assume that we will use ground darks. The cookbook should include a link to the ground-based read noise test results. mips-924: This task lists a turnaround time of 48h. It depends on the 160um IC, which has a 24-48h turnaround time. Other tasks depend on this one. Will Eiichi be available as a data monkey on this task, given that he is working with Almudena on the ICs? Check whether KG and JS are available to help CE as monkeys or if they have other tasks. mips-600: The IERs currently loaded cover 1/3, 1/2, 3/4, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0. We want 1/10, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 4.0. mips-922: This task runs for 6.6m. Chad points out that we will need to use 10s DCEs if we use a fainter star, increasing the runtime to 11.55m. The version that includes NF and SED runs 22.5m. We are collecting a NF IC in this campaign, so will we do the NF flux cal here? This task uses darks and ICs, yet has a turnaround time of 24h. That quick turnaround is not necessary because we do not use these results in this campaign. mips-920: This task runs for 8.2m. Chad points out that we will need to use 10s DCEs if we use a fainter star, increasing the runtime to 13m. This task uses darks and flats, yet has a turnaround time of 24h. That quick turnaround is not necessary because we do not use these results in this campaign. mips-137: No turnaround time is listed here. What is the need time? This task does not list the 70um darks or the 70um NF IC as calibration needs, but they must be needed. Can we meet the need time given the dependence on these calibration tasks? This is the second of two times of running this task (also in campaign I). In the cookbook, the DAT reduction is listed as one step with no details. Jane is the only AZ person listed as a data monkey. Will she be able to handle all of the data from all of these FPS tasks, or should we identify Team Ge as data monkeys for all of these FPS tasks? Are they needed before we finish the darks and ICs, or do they start their work once those results are available? mips-234: See my comments on mips-137. Also, I am very confused by the IER. It appears that DCEs are being taken in pairs, with stim flashes on one of the two DCEs. Yet relpos1 and relpos2 are not the same. Is this what we want? In Jocelyn's cookbook, it implies that the dark comes first, then the stim flash. This also seems improbable. This cookbook was clearly copies from mips-139 and still retains references to the SED position. mips-139: See my comments on mips-137. I am again confused by the IER.