There is a problem w/ your write-up. Check that you have valied entries for \$CAID and \$Campn in your analysis.php file. If that checks out, then Contact Stansberry"; return ; } // get first matching task $row = mysql_fetch_array($result); $title = $row["title"]; $princ = $row["principal"]; $deputy= $row["deputy"]; $campn0 = $row["campn0"]; $aorkeys = $row["aorkeys"]; // get real name of principal, deputies $princ = ioc_get_person($princ); $princ = $princ[0]; $deps = explode(",",$deputy); foreach ($deps as $depty) { $depty = trim($depty); $depty = ioc_get_person($depty); $depty = $depty[0]; $depty = explode(",",$depty); $depty = $depty[0]; // last names only $deplist[] = $depty; } $deplist = implode(", ", $deplist); $caid = sprintf("%03d",$caid); $file = "mips-".$caid.$campn.".analysis.php"; // if more matches, append the AORKEYS from those $numrows = mysql_num_rows($result); if ($numrows > 1) { $aorkeys = " " . $numrows . " Task Executions:  ". $aorkeys; for ($i=0;$i < mysql_num_rows($result); $i++) { $row = mysql_fetch_array($result); $morekeys = $row["aorkeys"]; $aorkeys = $aorkeys .';  '.$morekeys; } } // END PHP. ?> <? echo "MIPS-$caid, Campaign $campn IOC/SV Analysis"; ?>

Principal:
Deputy:
Analyst:
AORKEYS:
Last Updated:


Task Outcome Summary


Abstract

To measure the pixel locations (i.e. array orientation, scale) as a function of scan mirror angle for the 24µm array. The goal of this task is to estimate the location of the 24 micron prime frame with repsect to the telescope boresight. The location of the MIPS instrument frames are found in the frame tables and are given as brown angles. In order to estimate the instrument pointing frame (IPF), a combinations of spacecraft moves and mirror motions places the star on several locations on the array. In addition, these observations are "sandwiched" between observations of stars with the two PCRS. The MIPS team calibrates data and centroids the star on the 24 micron array. These centroided values are passed to the IPF team who uses observations of stars with the PCRS to provide the final calibration and estimate brown angles need to locate the instrument frame.

This task was supposed to be cancelled because the previous 24 coarse surveys were sufficient. Instead one run of the 24 micron fine FPS was done. The 24 micron fine FPS is also done in campaign R. The results from campaign R were used for FTU 15. The results from this run, campaign Q, and campaign R disagree by 1 arc second in the V direction. This is a large amount and cause ssome concern. The IPF team believes that there is strong evidence that the actual frame changed by 1 arc seccond between to the two runs. Below are the results from campaign Q.

Below are the results from camgaign R.

FTU 15 is based on campaign R.

For a complete summary of frame table updates see: Frame Table Updates


Analysis

The data was calibrated by J Morrison using mips_sloper and mips_caler and calibration files provided for this campaign. B Wheaton centroided the calibrated data and provided these centroided values in a CA file.

Results

The results from this FPS are summarized in IPF report 502095.


Conclusions

Comparing these results to those of Campaign R shows a disagreement in the brown angles in the V direction of 1 arc seconds. It appears the frame did change by that amount, the cause is unknown but something we need to keep track of in the future.

Output and Deliverable Products

CA and CS files were passed to the IPF team.

Actions Following Analysis

The differences in campaign Q and campaign R are unknown. We need revisit this in the future to look for other changes in the frame table that might need to be made.