CAID: MIPS-160 | Title: 70 and 160 um Thermal Anneal Behavior | |
System: MIPS | Principal: alberto | Deputy: kgordon |
Objective: | The behavior of the 70um and 160um arrays will be checked as a function of time since thermal anneal. The performance criteria will be read noise, dark current, stim repeatability, and responsivity. The main goal is to determine what frequency to anneal the Ga:Ge arrays. In addition, the behavior of read noise and dark current between anneals will be characterized. |
Description: | The goals of this task are to determine the thermal anneal frequency for the 70um and 160um arrays (major goal) and to characterize the behavior of the arrays between anneals (minor goal). The reason to anneal the Ga:Ge arrays is that the damage caused by cosmic rays accumulates and the achievable S/N decreases significantly. Thermal anneals have been shown to remove the affects of cosmic ray damage and "reset" the arrays. The default anneal frequency for both arrays is 3 hours. As it is not possible to accurately simulate the environment SIRTF will be in after launch, the actual desired anneal frequency is likely to be different from the default. The desired anneal frequency is also likely to be different between the 70um and 160um arrays. In order to determine the desired anneal frequencies, we will take data to evaluate the performance of both arrays for a period of 6 hours. At the start of this task, both arrays will be thermally annealed. For the next 6 hours, we will take data to evaluate the read noise, dark current, stim repeatability, and responsivity for both arrays. Taking other data with the 70um or 160um arrays is unlikely to be desirable during this task. Taking 24um data during this task is possible, but with the caveat that when the 160um stim is flashed, the 24um arrays sees this stim. |
Day: 53.336805555562 | Suggested Order: K400 | ||
Must be preceded by these activities (list by CAID): MIPS-246, MIPS-247, MIPS-248 | |||
Place in Schedule: This test should be done early in IOC, but after basic validation of the instrument has been done. This should be done before most of the other characterization tasks as having the right anneal frequency will increase the efficiency (i.e. no bad data near the end of the anneal period). | |||
Priority: Critical | |||
Conditions | |||
Maximum telescope temperature: | 6 K | ||
Minimum telescope temperature: | 5.5 K | ||
Should activity be repeated if focus changes? | No Repeat if focus changes by 0 mm | ||
Maximum absolute pointing uncertainty: | 3600 arcsec (1 sigma radial) | ||
Maximum precision offset uncertainty: | 3600 arcsec (1 sigma radial) | ||
Observatory configuration: | Standard | ||
Go/No Go criteria: | Array temperatures must be stable, detectors must be functioning nominally | ||
Duration: 360 minutes
| Real time downlink:
 
No | |
Data Volume (uncompressed): 3341 Mbits | |||
List Blocks, AORs, SERs, IERs, or unique sequences required (uplink): 24 dark, 70 dark, 160 dark, plus special IERs | |||
List Analysis tools required (downlink): Standard MIPS data reduction pipeline | |||
Estimate of data turn around: 72 hours | |||
Description: Run data through pipeline. Using the data, compute the read noise, dark current, stim repeatability, and responsivity as a function of time since anneal. This data will be used to assess the variation of the achievable S/N as a function of time since anneal. The anneal frequency for each array will be chosen to keep the achievable S/N within a reasonable (specified?) range. The variation of the read noise and dark current with time since anneal will be used as input to the MIPS pipeline. | |||
Can proceed in parallel with other activity: No | |||
Must outcome be confirmed before next activity: Yes | |||
Method of Confirmation: Standard "mips_sloper" trend analysis tool will be used. Results will be compared with groundbased laboratory data. | |||
Success criteria: Sufficient quality data must be obtained to measure the degradation of the S/N as a function of time since anneal. | |||
Contingency plan: If this test fails to execute or if it gives ambiguous answers, we will use the 3 hours as the nominal anneal frequency until other data can be taken/analyzed to give a better estimate of the anneal frequency. *IF* thermal anneal fail completely, then bias boost or photon flood anneals could be used. | |||
Comments | |||
References: | |||
Additional Comments:
| |||
This activity last updated: 10/8/2002 9:49:35 AM |