Sequencer Site SIRTF IOC Activity c. 2002

CAID: MIPS-160 Title: 70 and 160 um Thermal Anneal Behavior
 
System: MIPS Principal: alberto Deputy: kgordon
Objective:  
The behavior of the 70um and 160um arrays will be
checked as a function of time 
since thermal anneal.  The performance criteria
will be read noise, dark current, stim 
repeatability, and responsivity. The main goal is
to determine what frequency to 
anneal the Ga:Ge arrays.  In addition, the
behavior of read noise and dark current 
between anneals will be characterized.
 
Description:
The goals of this task are to determine the
thermal anneal frequency for the 70um and 
160um arrays (major goal) and to characterize the
behavior of the arrays between 
anneals (minor goal).  The reason to anneal the
Ga:Ge arrays is that the damage 
caused by cosmic rays accumulates and the
achievable S/N decreases significantly.  
Thermal anneals have been shown to remove the
affects of cosmic ray damage and 
"reset" the arrays.  The default anneal frequency
for both arrays is 3 hours.  As it is not 
possible to accurately simulate the environment
SIRTF will be in after launch, the 
actual desired anneal frequency is likely to be
different from the default.  The desired 
anneal frequency is also likely to be different
between the 70um and 160um arrays.

In order to determine the desired anneal
frequencies, we will take data to evaluate 
the performance of both arrays for a period of 6
hours.  At the start of this task, both 
arrays will be thermally annealed.  For the next 6
hours, we will take data to evaluate
the read noise, dark current, stim repeatability,
and responsivity for both arrays.  
Taking other data with the 70um or 160um arrays is
unlikely to be desirable during 
this task.  Taking 24um data during this task is
possible, but with the caveat that when 
the 160um stim is flashed, the 24um arrays sees
this stim.
 
Day:   53.336805555562 Suggested Order:   K400
 
Must be preceded by these activities (list by CAID):   MIPS-246, MIPS-247, MIPS-248
 
Place in Schedule:   This test should be done early in IOC, but after basic validation of the instrument has been done. This should be done before most of the other characterization tasks as having the right anneal frequency will increase the efficiency (i.e. no bad data near the end of the anneal period).
 
Priority:   Critical


Conditions

Maximum telescope temperature: 6 K
 
Minimum telescope temperature: 5.5 K
 
Should activity be repeated if focus changes?   No     Repeat if focus changes by 0 mm
 
Maximum absolute pointing uncertainty: 3600 arcsec (1 sigma radial)
 
Maximum precision offset uncertainty: 3600 arcsec  (1 sigma radial)
 
Observatory configuration: Standard
 
Go/No Go criteria: Array temperatures must be stable, detectors must be functioning nominally


Resources

Duration:   360 minutes
 
Real time downlink:   No   

Data Volume (uncompressed): 3341 Mbits
 
List Blocks, AORs, SERs, IERs, or unique sequences required (uplink): 24 dark, 70 dark, 160 dark, plus special IERs
 
List Analysis tools required (downlink):   Standard MIPS data reduction pipeline

Outcome


Estimate of data turn around:   72 hours
 
Description: Run data through pipeline. Using the data, compute the read noise, dark current, stim repeatability, and responsivity as a function of time since anneal. This data will be used to assess the variation of the achievable S/N as a function of time since anneal. The anneal frequency for each array will be chosen to keep the achievable S/N within a reasonable (specified?) range. The variation of the read noise and dark current with time since anneal will be used as input to the MIPS pipeline.
 
Can proceed in parallel with other activity: No
 
Must outcome be confirmed before next activity: Yes
 
Method of Confirmation:   Standard "mips_sloper" trend analysis tool will be used. Results will be compared with groundbased laboratory data.
 
 
Success criteria: Sufficient quality data must be obtained to measure the degradation of the S/N as a function of time since anneal.
 
Contingency plan:  If this test fails to execute or if it gives ambiguous answers, we will use the 3 hours as the nominal anneal frequency until other data can be taken/analyzed to give a better estimate of the anneal frequency. *IF* thermal anneal fail completely, then bias boost or photon flood anneals could be used.
 
 

Comments

 
References:  
 
Additional Comments:
 
This activity last updated: 10/8/2002 9:49:35 AM