MIPS- IOC Task Cookbook:
70 and 160 micron Latent Images and Saturation

Principal: Herve Dole
Deputy: Alberto Noriega-Crespo
Data Monkey(s): Not Me ! Please no !
Priority:
Downlink Priority: Normal
Analysis Time:
Last Updated: 14-Aug-2003; 25-Jun-2003; 06-Mar-2003; 20-Jan-2003
Cookbook Quick Navigation
Objective Description Data Data
Reformatting
Dependencies Calibration
Dependencies
Outputs Analysis Software Actions Failure Additional


Objective

Characterize the effect of very bright (saturated) sources at 70 and 160.

Description

Point sources with fluxes 50%, 100% and 500% of the full well will be observed. Each point source will be observed using both photometry (3s and 10s DCE) and scan map AOTs (4s DCE). 6 sources are needed for each of the 2 FIR arrays.

The goal of this task is to check the behavior of point sources as a function of how hard they saturate. The 50% well sources will be taken as a baseline for 100% and 500% sources.

Since the exact saturation level is poorly constrained, this tasks also aims at probing the flux space to see the effects on the arrays.

No various backgrounds are required since IOC MIPS-921 takes care of this.

I assume the following saturation levels (different from the SSC):
#-------------------------------------------------------
# Saturating flux mJy: 70   160 [H. Dole]
#  3s:      4399.32      9518.88
#  4s:      3299.49      7139.16
# 10s:      1319.80      2855.66
SSC saturation is:
#-------------------------------------------------------
# Saturating flux mJy: 70   160 [SSC]
#  3s:      1320.00      2000.00
#  4s:      1060.00      1600.00
# 10s:       482.00       722.00

Data Collected

For each array: The selection of IRAS sources has been done around the CVZ (RA: 16h-19h and DEC:55d-75d). 60 microns and 100 microns IRAS fluxes are used. 60 micron IRAS flux is supposed to track the MIPS 70 micron expected flux. 100 micron IRAS flux is supposed to track the MIPS 160 micron expected flux if it is a local ULIRG. In the worst case, the 160 micron flux might be overestimated.

Numbers given for 4s DCE:

Candidate Saturating Sources

IRAS
source

flux 60

factor
saturation
at 70

flux 100

factor
saturation
at 160

visibility

comment


(Jy)
(Jy)


18212+7432 10.3 3.1 31.78 4.5 CVZ v bright cold [source 1]
16577+5900 7.43 2.3 23.58 3.3 CVZ v bright cold [source 2]
16418+6540 3.45 1.1 7.37 1.6 CVZ bright cold [source 3]
F17069+6047 3.01 0.9 4.99 0.7 CVZ bright (less) cold [source 4]
18525+5518 2.05 0.62 4.49 0.63 CVZ faint cold
F17487+5637 1.6 0.49 4.0 0.56 CVZ faint cold
F16460+5910 1.4 0.42 3.2 0.45 CVZ faint cold [source 5]
18525+5518 2.05 0.6 4.5 0.6 CVZ faint cold
17403+6234 2.08 0.6 1.03 0.15 CVZ faint warm [source 6]
17240+7154 1.48 0.45 1.75 0.25 CVZ faint warm
Table 1. IRAS Sources to use for this task.
"faint" is appropriate to probe
the regime between HD's and SSC's
saturation window.
"cold" means cold source (rising spectrum),
"warm" mean warm source (decreasing spectrum).



Data Reformatting Requirements

Array Data Desired:

70 µm, 160 µm

Data Reformatting Option:

Special Instructions:

Task Dependencies


Calibration Dependencies


Output and Deliverable Products


Data Analysis


Software Requirements


Actions Following Analysis


Failure Modes and Responses


Additional Notes