Sequencer Site SIRTF IOC Activity c. 2002

CAID: MIPS-321 Title: 24 um Ph/SR AOT Validation - final
 
System: MIPS Principal: dlp Deputy: cengelbracht
Objective:  
Validate the MIPS Photometry AOT (24um) as ready
for beginning of science observations.
 
Description:
Execute MIPS Phot/SR AOT for a sensible range of 
selectable parameters.	
Can be the same as: Select final operational 
parameters

Tune IPP file as needed
		
Several AORs will be constructed that will have :	
	
1) one small field  AOR for each available
exposure time
2) large field AOR for all three exposure times 
3) large field AOR (3 s only) for three different
24 micron reference positions
4) do one instance of 1 and 2 for 3 cycles for 10
seconds 
5) raster map check 3x3 3 s only
6) do 1 for 20 cycles (10s only)
 
Day:   61.3847222222248 Suggested Order:   O250
 
Must be preceded by these activities (list by CAID):   MIPS-320
 
Place in Schedule:   After preliminary AOT validation, aperture door open, CTA cooldown complete, focus stable, CSMM functioning, commanding checked. This should be the last task to validate the MIPS PH/SR AOT for science observations.
 
Priority:   Necessary


Conditions

Maximum telescope temperature: 5.5 K
 
Minimum telescope temperature: 5.5 K
 
Should activity be repeated if focus changes?   Yes     Repeat if focus changes by 0 mm
 
Maximum absolute pointing uncertainty: 3 arcsec (1 sigma radial)
 
Maximum precision offset uncertainty: 0.5 arcsec  (1 sigma radial)
 
Observatory configuration: standard
 
Go/No Go criteria: All detector, CSMM, observatories anomalies resolved


Resources

Duration:   144 minutes
 
Real time downlink:   No   

Data Volume (uncompressed): 520 Mbits
 
List Blocks, AORs, SERs, IERs, or unique sequences required (uplink): MIPS Ph/SR AORs only
 
List Analysis tools required (downlink):   Interactive MIPS pipeline; image analysis package; telemetry analysis

Outcome


Estimate of data turn around:   100 hours
 
Description: Each submode of the AOT must be analyzed to compare actual versus expected image position; comparison versus telemetry is also required; final tweaks in parameter values will be determined
 
Can proceed in parallel with other activity: No
 
Must outcome be confirmed before next activity: Yes
 
Method of Confirmation:   image and telemetry analysis
 
 
Success criteria: All data obtained; no saturation problems; CSMM positioning as expected; good image quality
 
Contingency plan: 
 
 

Comments

 
References:  
 
Additional Comments:
 
This activity last updated: 10/24/2001 3:44:55 PM