| CAID: MIPS-321 | Title: 24 um Ph/SR AOT Validation - final | |
| System: MIPS | Principal: dlp | Deputy: cengelbracht |
| Objective: | Validate the MIPS Photometry AOT (24um) as ready for beginning of science observations. |
| Description: | Execute MIPS Phot/SR AOT for a sensible range of selectable parameters. Can be the same as: Select final operational parameters Tune IPP file as needed Several AORs will be constructed that will have : 1) one small field AOR for each available exposure time 2) large field AOR for all three exposure times 3) large field AOR (3 s only) for three different 24 micron reference positions 4) do one instance of 1 and 2 for 3 cycles for 10 seconds 5) raster map check 3x3 3 s only 6) do 1 for 20 cycles (10s only) |
| Day: 61.3847222222248 | Suggested Order: O250 | ||
| Must be preceded by these activities (list by CAID): MIPS-320 | |||
| Place in Schedule: After preliminary AOT validation, aperture door open, CTA cooldown complete, focus stable, CSMM functioning, commanding checked. This should be the last task to validate the MIPS PH/SR AOT for science observations. | |||
| Priority: Necessary | |||
Conditions | |||
| Maximum telescope temperature: | 5.5 K | ||
| Minimum telescope temperature: | 5.5 K | ||
| Should activity be repeated if focus changes? | Yes Repeat if focus changes by 0 mm | ||
| Maximum absolute pointing uncertainty: | 3 arcsec (1 sigma radial) | ||
| Maximum precision offset uncertainty: | 0.5 arcsec (1 sigma radial) | ||
| Observatory configuration: | standard | ||
| Go/No Go criteria: | All detector, CSMM, observatories anomalies resolved | ||
Duration: 144 minutes
| | Real time downlink:
 
No | | |||
| Data Volume (uncompressed): 520 Mbits | |||
| List Blocks, AORs, SERs, IERs, or unique sequences required (uplink): MIPS Ph/SR AORs only | |||
| List Analysis tools required (downlink): Interactive MIPS pipeline; image analysis package; telemetry analysis | |||
| Estimate of data turn around: 100 hours | |||
| Description: Each submode of the AOT must be analyzed to compare actual versus expected image position; comparison versus telemetry is also required; final tweaks in parameter values will be determined | |||
| Can proceed in parallel with other activity: No | |||
| Must outcome be confirmed before next activity: Yes | |||
| Method of Confirmation: image and telemetry analysis | |||
| Success criteria: All data obtained; no saturation problems; CSMM positioning as expected; good image quality | |||
| Contingency plan: | |||
Comments | |||
| References: | |||
|
Additional Comments:
| |||
| This activity last updated: 10/24/2001 3:44:55 PM | |||