There is a problem w/ your write-up. Check that you have valied entries for \$CAID and \$Campn in your analysis.php file. If that checks out, then Contact Stansberry"; return ; } // get first matching task $row = mysql_fetch_array($result); $title = $row["title"]; $princ = $row["principal"]; $deputy= $row["deputy"]; $campn0 = $row["campn0"]; $aorkeys = $row["aorkeys"]; // get real name of principal, deputies $princ = ioc_get_person($princ); $princ = $princ[0]; $deps = explode(",",$deputy); foreach ($deps as $depty) { $depty = trim($depty); $depty = ioc_get_person($depty); $depty = $depty[0]; $depty = explode(",",$depty); $depty = $depty[0]; // last names only $deplist[] = $depty; } $deplist = implode(", ", $deplist); $caid = sprintf("%03d",$caid); $file = "mips-".$caid.$campn.".analysis.php"; // if more matches, append the AORKEYS from those $numrows = mysql_num_rows($result); if ($numrows > 1) { $aorkeys = " " . $numrows . " Task Executions:  ". $aorkeys; for ($i=0;$i < mysql_num_rows($result); $i++) { $row = mysql_fetch_array($result); $morekeys = $row["aorkeys"]; $aorkeys = $aorkeys .';  '.$morekeys; } } // END PHP. ?> <? echo "MIPS-$caid, Campaign $campn IOC/SV Analysis"; ?>

Principal:
Deputy:
Analyst:
AORKEYS:
Last Updated:


Task Outcome Summary


Abstract

The selected star HD 183439 was acquired in both Wide and Narrow Field, with an offset of approx. 12arcsec with respect the best expected position. 70um First Light gave us a surprise with an increase noise in side B. The appearance of the array was worsen by the out-of-scale ramps in that side. Although I am the principal of the task, essentially everybody in the Ge:Ga team is working to understand this behavior and to how overcome its negative effects with the increasing noise. The commanding of the AOR itself, in terms of numbers of DCEs and Stim Cycles is correct. The Photometric observing pattern for the 70um Wide Field mode, however, started on the right-hand-side of the image i.e. unlike the description of the Handbook. The pattern of Narrow Field cycle also started at a different place than advertised, upper-left instead of lower left. Although this observation is not strictly speaking a calibrator, a calibration factor of 0.7-0.8 DN/s/Jy was obtained (see Task-992). The data is noisy and this number should not be used for calibration.

Analysis

The original task consisted of 4 independent AORS: two Wide Field at 3 and 10secs, one cyle with 16 DCEs each; and two Narrow Field, 3 and 10sec, one cycle with 21 DCEs each. The data went through the standard processing MIPL --> TRANHEAD --> REPACK --> DAT (version 2.31). I used Karl Gordon's darks and IC corrections obtained on October 10, in the campaign. No linearity correction was used. The final mosaic images were obtained by coadding the single images, where centroids determined by hand were used (no WCS available at the time), this seems to degrade the look and flux of the star in the final mosaic.

Results

Figure 1 shows one DCE where the star is clearly seeing [pixel(22,13)] in the Wide Field. Figure 2 shows the radial profile of the star based on the 10sec mosaic. Figure 3 shows the star in a Narrow Field frame for one DCE (source at pixel (20,14). Figure 4. Shows the mosaic created by Dr. Alonso-Herrero a week later using the corrected pointing and better illumination correction of the 3 and 10sec observations of HD183439 in the Wide and Narrow Field modes.


Figure 1: Star HD 183439 on a Single DCE in the 70um Wide Field mode.


Figure 1: Radial profile of HD 183439 in the 70um Wide Field mode


Figure 3: Star HD 183439 on a Single DCE in the 70um Narrow Field mode.


Figure 3: Mosaic of the 70um Wide and Narrow Field modes of HD183439 (Alonso-Herrero).

System Throughput Following task MIPS-922, the total counts from the star were determined by using a 5 pixel radius for the aperture, and a 4 pixel annulus - from 8 to 12 pixels - for the sky. The counts in the Wide field 3 and 10sec observations were 0.34 and 0.41 DN/s. The median sky annuli counts were 0.018 and 0.017 DN/sec, respectively. I borrowed Chad's (see MIPS-922) aperture size correction of 1.15. The flux for HD183439 is 0.582 Jy at 70um, therefore the DN/s to Jy ratio is (using the better S/N of the 10sec measurements): 0.41*1.15/0.582 = 0.81. The background level for 0.0170 DN/s implies a surface density: 0.0170 DN/s/0.81 DN/s/JY*1.e-6 MJy/J/(9.84/206265)**2 sr/pix = 9.1 MJy/sr slightly lower than the predicted by SPOT (11.80MJy/sr on Oct 10, 2003), but our conversion factor could be off by as much as 25%. (Notice that the 0.34 DN/s measurement from the 3sec observations give a 0.67 DN/s/Jy factor, closer to that determined in MIPS-922 - 0.63 - and give a background of 11.11 MJy/sr) The Narrow Field data was too noise to perform a similar exercise.

Conclusions

The star appears in both Wide and Narrow 70um fields. The position of the star in the Wide Field appears flipped left-to-right, while in the Narrow Field appears upside down and flipped left-to-right. The WCS parameter are invalid, but they should be properly implemented in Campaign J. Considering the above 2 caveats, the pattern of observations is roughly correct.

Output and Deliverable Products

Mosaic images are available upon request. Better processed data, however, is being obtained by K. Gordon and A. Alonso-Herrero

Actions Following Analysis

Troubleshooting of noise in side B is being performed. The orientation of the 70um Wide and Narrow field are being worked out. Problems populating the WCS are being addressed by the SSC.