Estimate of data turn around:
504 hours |
|
Description:
2D maps of the array PSFs
|
|
Can proceed in parallel with other activity:
No |
|
Must outcome be confirmed before next activity:
No |
|
Method of Confirmation:
Data analysis. Detailed PSF structure as a
function of position on the array will be evaluated
using several techniques including comparison
with STiny TIM PSF models, encircled energy
measurements and various profile characterization
methods.
|
|
|
Success criteria:
Observations:
Must acquire sufficient sampling to ensure 4x
oversampled PSF core over most of arrays.
IOC Requirement:
PSF should contain encircled energy in spec.
Field distortions in P
|
|
Contingency plan:
Repeat with a brighter/fainter star and asteroid
|
|
|
|
Comments |
|
References:
|
|
Additional Comments:
Estimated times can be decreased considerably by doing
only a portion of 1 scan/array. S/C offsetting
accurate to 0.4" (TBR) for 24 mm, to 0.5" (TBR) for 70
mm and 1.5" (TBR) for 160 mm
After CTA/instrument cool down:
For 24um, the backgrd radiance must be less than
1.0E-11 W/cm2/sr (< 30K).
For 70um, the backgrd radiance must be less than
1.0E-12 W/cm2/sr (< 12 K).
For 160um, the backgrd radiance must be less than
5.4E-13 W/cm2/sr (< 6 K).
Arrays flat-fielded; geometries measured. Bright
asteroid in OPZ: Parthenope, Vesta, & Psyche are
possibilities, but actual targets need to be
reassessed.
Asteroid should not show obvious photometric
variability on timescales shorter than or comparable to
the MIPS observations.
You probably need to put in chops to sky between
observations. Otherwise the slow response will kill
you.
|
|
This activity last updated: 10/24/2001 3:53:24 PM
|