// ENTER CAID, CAMPN, and Analyst WITHIN THE QUOTES IN THE FOLLOWING 2 LINES ... $caid="912"; // e.g. $caid = "90"; $campn="K"; // e.g. $campn = "D2" or $campn = "Q" or $campn="meta"; $analyst="K. Gordon"; // e.g. $analyst="D. Kelly"; // YOU CAN SKIP DOWN TO THE OUTCOME SECTION NOW. include ("IOC_connect.php"); // this line isn't for you include ("IOC_log_fns.php"); // this line isn't for you $db = ioc_db_connect(); $query="select * from ioc_tasks where camp_crnt = '$campn' and caid = $caid "; $result = mysql_query($query); if (mysql_num_rows($result) < 1) { echo "
Principal: = $princ;?>
Deputy: = $deplist;?>
Analyst: = $analyst;?>
AORKEYS: if (! $aorkeys) {echo "unknown";} else { echo $aorkeys;}?>
Last Updated: if (file_exists($file)) {echo date("D M d Y, H:i:s", filemtime($file) ) ;} ?>
The dark data were reduced using the DAT version 2-32. Sensitive cosmic ray detection (mips_sloper comandline switch -q) was used and the electronic nonlinearity correction was not applied. The read niose input into mips_sloper was 100 electrons. The dark datasets were run through mips_caler. Finally, the dark image for d3 were created using mips_enhancer. The mips_enhancer was run with the commandline options "-OW -OD -D". The noise was measured from the noise datasets using the get_rdnoise.pro program.
The d3 dark images were examined. As has already been reported elsewhere, this array has a bad readout (1x5 region). The measured dark is give below.
160 Dark (d3) |
---|
![]() scale = 0 - 0.06 counts = (2.58 +/- 1.28)X10-2 |
The noise were determined for the d3 noise datasets. Many of the pixels on have many cosmic rays. Thus, we have measured the noise both with the new empirical method as well as the standard method. Our standard method of measuring noise is to determine the standard deviation of all the slopes of a pixel without detected cosmic rays. The empirical method is to do an iterative sigma rejection of deviant slopes. The results of the two methods are shown below. Given the middle reset each DCE, the noise measurement is for the average of two 5 MIPS second ramps. Thus, the effective exposure of the measurements is two times 5 MIPS seconds, not 10 MIPS seconds. This point is made as the noise we are measuring is 1/f noise and the specifics of how the data are taken are important. We have also quoted the noise on the good engineering pixels. These "pixelless" pixels give a good measure of the noise introduced by the electronics themselves. In the images below, the middle (non-existant) row has been removed.
The noise measurement given here is the noise in excess of that expected from photon statistics.
The dark measured in the d3 position should be used for standard calibrations.
The dark calibration image to be used for standard calibrations of campaign K data has been delivered and distributed with the suite of CamK cal files.
No actions necessary.