There is a problem w/ your write-up. Check that you have valied entries for \$CAID and \$Campn in your analysis.php file. If that checks out, then Contact Stansberry"; return ; } // get first matching task $row = mysql_fetch_array($result); $title = $row["title"]; $princ = $row["principal"]; $deputy= $row["deputy"]; $campn0 = $row["campn0"]; $aorkeys = $row["aorkeys"]; // get real name of principal, deputies $princ = ioc_get_person($princ); $princ = $princ[0]; $deps = explode(",",$deputy); foreach ($deps as $depty) { $depty = trim($depty); $depty = ioc_get_person($depty); $depty = $depty[0]; $depty = explode(",",$depty); $depty = $depty[0]; // last names only $deplist[] = $depty; } $deplist = implode(", ", $deplist); $caid = sprintf("%03d",$caid); $file = "mips-".$caid.$campn.".analysis.php"; // if more matches, append the AORKEYS from those $numrows = mysql_num_rows($result); if ($numrows > 1) { $aorkeys = " " . $numrows . " Task Executions:  ". $aorkeys; for ($i=0;$i < mysql_num_rows($result); $i++) { $row = mysql_fetch_array($result); $morekeys = $row["aorkeys"]; $aorkeys = $aorkeys .';  '.$morekeys; } } // END PHP. ?> <? echo "MIPS-$caid, Campaign $campn IOC/SV Analysis"; ?>

Principal:
Deputy:
Analyst:
AORKEYS:
Last Updated:


Task Outcome Summary


Abstract

We have constructed the 160micron ICs obtained in PHOTOMETRY and SCAN modes. This report is the same for MIPS-919 (160micron PHOT IC) and MIPS-916 (160micron SCAN IC) as both modes are analyzed together. The standard deviations of the 160micron ICs over the entire array are approximately 50% and 51% for SCAN and PHOTOMETRY modes, respectively, but these statistics includes the illumination pattern of the 160micron array.

Analysis

In PHOTOMETRY mode we obtained a 9 point dither map (1 cycle) at 160micron with 3 second DCEs of one region of the sky (zodi_28b) chosen to avoid bright point sources. The offsets between positions are 300 arcseconds. At each position of the dither pattern there are 16 images (4 of which are stim flashes), so a total of 108 sky images were obtained to construct the 160micron Illumination Correction (IC).

In SCAN mode we have observed 2 degrees (1 leg) in fast mode for three different regions of the sky (zodi_13a, zodi_28a, and zodi28b). Note that two of the 160micron SCAN regions were observed in MIPS-914 and MIPS-916.

Since these tasks are repeated a number of times during IOC, we will observe different regions of the sky each time. The tasks will check for possible variations of quality of IC or saturation. This task will also be useful for screening regions of the sky to obtain ICs in SIRTF routine operations.

The reduction was performed with the DAT programs. We used mips_sloper with sensitive cosmic ray detection (-q option) turning off the electronic non-linearity correction, mips_caler (using the 160micron me_160_dark_CamK_26oct2003.fits) and mips_enhancer with the following options:

verbose = 0
scale = 1.
filename = ic160_scan
prefix = ic_scan160
nXTile = 1
nYTile = 1
dark = 0
flat = 0
illumination_correction = 1
NormalizeInput = 1
SigmaCut = 3.0
SigmaTolerance = 0.25
MaxIterations = 10
StackSTDEV = 0
OutlierMinPoints = 3
QuartileFactor = 10
OverlapTolerance = 0.5
diagonistics = 1
WriteGeometry = 0
WriteOutlier = 0
WriteTiles = 0
FluxMean = 0
FluxMedian = 1
OverWrite = 1
distortion = 0
UseBoostFrame = 1
reject = 1


Note that we rejected the first DCE after the stim flash (reject = 1 option) and normalized the input images (NormalizeInput = 1 option).

The regions of the sky observed were:

zodi_13a (RA=07:03:28.1676 and Dec=+27:40:03.6574, J2000) with a predicted brightness at 160micron of 8.5 MJy/sr,
zodi_28a (RA=21:05:07.4259 and Dec=-21:54:04.3864, J2000) with a predicted brightness at 160micron of 9.9 MJy/sr.
zodi_28b (RA=21:32:18.5321 and Dec=-19:52:22.7257, J2000) with a predicted brightness at 160micron of 9.1 MJy/sr,


The predicted values of the 160micron brightness are from SPOT for the date of th e observing (Oct 24, 2003).


Results

The PHOTOMETRY and SCAN mode 160micron ICs for Campaign K are shown in Figure1. Statistics on the images provides the following (mean, std, median, mode, skewness, min, max):

PHOT two reg (108DCEs): 1.002   0.5131   0.9873   0.3074    0.229   0.2818    2.078
SCAN three reg (480DCEs): 1.003   0.5024    1.033    1.221   0.2181   0.2917    2.05
SCAN zodi13a (160DCEs): 0.9904   0.4908    1.011   0.3072   0.1549   0.2827    1.966
SCAN zodi28a (160DCEs): 1.009   0.5033    1.002   0.3356   0.2305   0.3104    2.044
SCAN zodi28b (160DCEs): 1.006   0.5081   0.9841   0.3108   0.2348   0.2854    2.081



Figure1. Comparison of 160micron Illumination Corrections obtained in PHOTOMETRY (left) and SCAN modes (right). Both are displayed from z1=0. to z2=2.


A better way to assess the quality of the observed ICs is to remove the illumination pattern of the 160micron array. To do so, we ratioed different 160micron IC. The statistics (mean, std, median, mode, skewness, min, max) on the images provides the following:

ratio ICs PHOT(108DCEs)/SCAN(480DCEs): 0.9917    0.02941   0.9932   0.9802 -0.2008   0.9261    1.055

ratio ICs SCAN zodi13a/zodi28a: 0.9811    0.03667   0.9824   0.9765   0.1452   0.9048    1.084

ratio ICs SCAN zodi13a/zodi28b: 0.9883    0.03963    0.985    1.01   0.2472   0.8968    1.075

ratio ICs SCAN zodi28a/zodi28b: 1.008    0.03772    1.004   0.9896   0.6203    0.95    1.099



Conclusions

We have constructed 160micron ICs obtained in PHOTOMETRY and SCAN modes using three regions of the sky (zodi_13a, zodi_28a, zodi_28b). The standard deviations of the 160micron ICs over the entire array are approximately 50%, but this statistics includes the illumination pattern of the 160micron array. If we remove the illumination pattern by ratioing two SCAN ICs, we find that the rms is approximately 4%.

Output and Deliverable Products

160micron IC to be used to reduce data obtained in campaign O.

Actions Following Analysis