<? echo "MIPS-$caid, Campaign $campn IOC/SV Analysis"; ?>

There is a problem w/ your write-up. Check that you have valied entries for \$CAID and \$Campn in your analysis.php file. If that checks out, then Contact Stansberry"; return ; } // get first matching task $row = mysql_fetch_array($result); $title = $row["title"]; $princ = $row["principal"]; $deputy= $row["deputy"]; $campn0 = $row["campn0"]; $aorkeys = $row["aorkeys"]; // get real name of principal, deputies $princ = ioc_get_person($princ); $princ = $princ[0]; $deps = explode(",",$deputy); foreach ($deps as $depty) { $depty = trim($depty); $depty = ioc_get_person($depty); $depty = $depty[0]; $depty = explode(",",$depty); $depty = $depty[0]; // last names only $deplist[] = $depty; } $deplist = implode(", ", $deplist); $caid = sprintf("%03d",$caid); $file = "mips-".$caid.$campn.".analysis.php"; // if more matches, append the AORKEYS from those $numrows = mysql_num_rows($result); if ($numrows > 1) { $aorkeys = " " . $numrows . " Task Executions: ". $aorkeys; for ($i=0;$i < mysql_num_rows($result); $i++) { $row = mysql_fetch_array($result); $morekeys = $row["aorkeys"]; $aorkeys = $aorkeys .'; '.$morekeys; } } // END PHP. ?> <? echo "MIPS-$caid, Campaign $campn IOC/SV Analysis"; ?>

Principal:
Deputy:
Analyst:
AORKEYS:
Last Updated:

Task Outcome Summary

DATA STATUS: Nominal
TASK OUTCOME: Nominal

Abstract

This is the routine 24µm flux calibration. The purpose of this task in Campaign H1 (switched to CE2) is to check 24 um calibration using CE2. There were some SSC exposure naming errors so the DCE sequence was packed in wrong order. Nevertheless, the data are nominal, and calibration values seem consistent with the data using CE1. The calibration is 1.47e5 DN/s/Jy and is well-matched to previous calibration measurements within the uncertainties.

Analysis

The data were processed with version 2.41 of the DAT, using the campaign K dark image and a combined flat image of campaign E,F and G. A centroid measurement and aperture photometry was performed on the star in each of 30 DCEs. These data were used to derive a flux calibration. The data were coadded to make a mosaic, which was examined for background sources or other problems which would bias the flux measurement.

Results

Data Collected

As expected, this task generated a total of 30 Si:As DCEs on the star and 7 more in the stim IER. Due to the wrong naming in exposure IDs in SSC database, the data were packed in wrong DCE sequence. Nevertheless, the data are still useful for calibration purposes.

System Throughput

The total counts from the star in all 30 DCEs are computed using IDL program with the same aperture parameters as the ones in previous campaigns. Details about total counts in individual DCE are avaliable here. The average total counts is 6.942e+04 ± 1.168e3 (1.68%) DN/s. The individual DCE measurement are both plotted in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Counts for HD159330 as a function of DCE number for different flats.

Conclusions

The 24µm flux calibration continues to be stable and remains unchanged between CE1 and CE2.