There is a problem w/ your write-up. Check that you have valied entries for \$CAID and \$Campn in your analysis.php file. If that checks out, then Contact Stansberry"; return ; } // get first matching task $row = mysql_fetch_array($result); $title = $row["title"]; $princ = $row["principal"]; $deputy= $row["deputy"]; $campn0 = $row["campn0"]; $aorkeys = $row["aorkeys"]; // get real name of principal, deputies $princ = ioc_get_person($princ); $princ = $princ[0]; $deps = explode(",",$deputy); foreach ($deps as $depty) { $depty = trim($depty); $depty = ioc_get_person($depty); $depty = $depty[0]; $depty = explode(",",$depty); $depty = $depty[0]; // last names only $deplist[] = $depty; } $deplist = implode(", ", $deplist); $caid = sprintf("%03d",$caid); $file = "mips-".$caid.$campn.".analysis.php"; // if more matches, append the AORKEYS from those $numrows = mysql_num_rows($result); if ($numrows > 1) { $aorkeys = " " . $numrows . " Task Executions:  ". $aorkeys; for ($i=0;$i < mysql_num_rows($result); $i++) { $row = mysql_fetch_array($result); $morekeys = $row["aorkeys"]; $aorkeys = $aorkeys .';  '.$morekeys; } } // END PHP. ?> <? echo "MIPS-$caid, Campaign $campn IOC/SV Analysis"; ?>

Principal:
Deputy:
Analyst:
AORKEYS:
Last Updated:


Task Outcome Summary


Abstract

This is the routine 24µm flux calibration. The target was HD159330. The calibration is 1.5e5 DN/s/Jy and is well-matched to previous calibration measurements within the uncertainties.

Analysis

The data were reprocessed with version 2.41 of the DAT, using the campaign K dark and scan mirror dependent flats from campaign K. A centroid measurement and aperture photometry was performed on the star in each of 30 DCEs. These data were used to derive a flux calibration. The data were coadded to make a mosaic, which was examined for background sources or other problems which would bias the flux measurement.

Results

Data Collected

As expected, this task generated a total of 30 Si:As DCEs on the star and 7 more in the stim IER. Using the scan mirror dependent (s.m.d.) flats, the dark spots caused by dusts on pick-up mirror have been correctedly flat-fielded. Campaign J was in the middle of solar storm (X-class). There are some high energe cosmic hit on the DCE 18, which caused the readout coloum of the hit has slight higher values than the other columns resulting jail-bar pattern on the data as shown in Figure 1. Other huge cosmic rays on the 24 um data are shown in here and here .


Figure 1: Huge Cosmic Ray hit in DCE 18 (image on the left) causing the jail-bar pattern on the data and the latent image on the DCE 19.


System Throughput

The total counts from the star in all 30 DCEs are computed using IDL program with the same aperture parameters as the ones in previous campaigns. For comparison, the aperture photometry are computed both on the data with regular flat and with s.m.d. flats. The one with s.m.d. flats gives the counts of 6.929e+04 ± 1.226e+03 (1.77%) DN/s (ignoring the boost DCEs), and the one with regular flat gives the counts of 6.977e+04 ± 1.160e3 (1.66%) DN/s. The individual DCE measurement are both plotted in Figure 2.


Figure 2: Counts for HD159330 as a function of DCE number for different flats.

As shown in Figure 1, the one with regular flat gives <=1% higher counts than the one with s.m.d. flats. Details about the differences are available here. This systemactic offset between the regular and s.m.d. flats is under investigating. Nevertheless, the difference is still within the measurement errors. I use the s.m.d. flat measurement for the final value quoted. Using the aperture correction of 1.146, the total counts from the target is 7.941e+04 DN/s, so the ratio of DN/s to Jy is 1.47e5. This conversion factor is very similar to that measured for this star during other campaigns.


Stimulator

The stimulator IER behaved as expected, producing 7 images of the flat-field stimulator. The data were processed with mips_sloper in a fashion identical to that described above for the sky images. Figure 3 shows the historgram over the whole array in individual DCE. The 5-sigmaclip mean value is also listed in each DCE. (Note that 1st DCE has SUR on-board algorithm wrong, so the statistics from DCE#1 should be ignored.)


Figure 3: Histrogram on the Stim over DCEs


Conclusions


Output and Deliverable Products

The flux calibration is delivered in this writeup. The calibration images and mosaic are available should they be needed.


Actions Following Analysis