There is a problem w/ your write-up. Check that you have valied entries
for \$CAID and \$Campn in your analysis.php file. If that checks out, then
Contact Stansberry";
return ;
}
// get first matching task
$row = mysql_fetch_array($result);
$title = $row["title"];
$princ = $row["principal"];
$deputy= $row["deputy"];
$campn0 = $row["campn0"];
$aorkeys = $row["aorkeys"];
// get real name of principal, deputies
$princ = ioc_get_person($princ);
$princ = $princ[0];
$deps = explode(",",$deputy);
foreach ($deps as $depty) {
$depty = trim($depty);
$depty = ioc_get_person($depty);
$depty = $depty[0];
$depty = explode(",",$depty);
$depty = $depty[0]; // last names only
$deplist[] = $depty;
}
$deplist = implode(", ", $deplist);
$caid = sprintf("%03d",$caid);
$file = "mips-".$caid.$campn.".analysis.php";
// if more matches, append the AORKEYS from those
$numrows = mysql_num_rows($result);
if ($numrows > 1) {
$aorkeys = " " . $numrows . " Task Executions: ". $aorkeys;
for ($i=0;$i < mysql_num_rows($result); $i++) {
$row = mysql_fetch_array($result);
$morekeys = $row["aorkeys"];
$aorkeys = $aorkeys .'; '.$morekeys;
}
}
// END PHP.
?>
<? echo "MIPS-$caid, Campaign $campn IOC/SV Analysis"; ?>
Principal:
Deputy:
Analyst:
AORKEYS:
Last Updated:
Task Outcome Summary
- DATA STATUS: Anomalous
The data was flipped along x axis. This data has an orientation of 180 degrees from the wide field. This is as to be expected from the code-V results. However, the code V results have the 24, 160 and 70 N with 180 degree rotation from the sky to detector and 0 degree rotation for the 70 W. We found that all the wide fields (24, 160 70W) have a 180 rotation from sky to pixels and only the 70 N has 0 degree rotation (resulting from difference optical path).
- TASK OUTCOME: Nominal
Abstract
Before carrying out the focal plane survey for 70 µm NF (campaign I), we want to check the suitability of the targets. They should not be saturated, too weak, or obviously extended. The S/N in one 3 sec integration should be good, > 30. We have 3 candidates for the 70 µm wide field. We will execute 1 small field AOT per source, with 3 sec integrations. We used that data from this task along with the 70 micron first light data to do a "pre-coarse" focal plane survey. We centroided the data using IPD3 and created a CA file with the centroided data sent this file to the instrument pointing frame (IPF) team. The quality of the data (one side bad) prevented us from using the centroiding program written for the FPS.
The location of the MIPS instrument frames are found in the frame tables and are given as brown angles. In order to estimate the instrument pointing frame, a combinations of spacecraft moves and mirror motions places the star on several locations on the array. In addition, these observations are "sandwiched" between observations of stars with the two PCRS. The MIPS team calibrates data and centroids the star on array. These centroided values are passed to the IPF team who uses observations of stars with the PCRS to provide the final calibration and estimate brown angles need to locate the instrument frame.
The results from the IPF team recommended the following changes to the brown angles for the prime frame : delta_theta_Y (0.1925 arc minutes), delta_theta_Z (2.103819 arc minutes), delta_angle (-0.000071 degrees). The IPF team gave an accuracy of the locating the 70 micron narrow prime frame center as 2.0543 arc seconds. The requirement was 1.12 arc seconds after the coarse survey. The large change (> 2 arc minutes) in the theta_Z has caused concern. These was some concern that the mirror motion in this AOT was incorrect so NO frame table was updated. We wanted to wait until we got more data. However campaign J the data confirmed we needed to move the theta_Z by at least 2 arc minutes.
Analysis
The data was calibrated by J Morrison using mips_sloper and mips_caler and calibration files provided for this campaign. This data was centroided using IDP3.
Results
We found a suitable star for the focal planes surveys. We got a bonus with this data because we were able to send it to the IPF team who gave us a recommendation for the brown angles. The change is theta_Z proved to be large so we decided to wait until get got more data since there was confusion if the mirror moves where correct for this AOT (later Cam J we found they were).
Conclusions
Wait for more data to check large change in theta_Z.
Output and Deliverable Products
CA and CS files were passed to the IPF team
Actions Following Analysis