// ENTER CAID, CAMPN, and Analyst WITHIN THE QUOTES IN THE FOLLOWING 2 LINES ... $caid="990"; // e.g. $caid = "90"; $campn="B"; // e.g. $campn = "D2" or $campn = "Q"; $analyst="D. Kelly; J. Stansberry"; // e.g. $analyst="D. Kelly"; // YOU CAN SKIP DOWN TO THE OUTCOME SECTION NOW. include ("IOC_connect.php"); // this line isn't for you include ("IOC_log_fns.php"); // this line isn't for you $db = ioc_db_connect(); $query="select * from ioc_tasks where camp_crnt = '$campn' and caid = $caid limit 1"; $result = mysql_query($query); if (mysql_num_rows($result) != 1) { echo "
Principal:
Deputy:
Analyst:
AORKEYS: if (! $aorkeys) {echo "unknown";} else { echo $aorkeys;}?>
Last Updated: if (file_exists($file)) {echo date("D M d Y, H:i:s", filemtime($file) ) ;} ?>
The diagnostic dumps from the thermal anneal are translated into temperatures and plotted
for comparison with other anneals, and to verify operation of the anneal heater. DN images
from the reset-read frames of the 2 RAW exposures are examined and compared to determine
if the anneal changed the response of the array in any way (see NOTE in Abstract, however).
Succesful completion of the state transitions is confirmed by the lack of any errors.
The temperature plots are presented in the analysis for mips-900 in this
campaign, and can be seen here.
The temperature behavior during the anneal was nominal.
The figure below shows DN images from the reset-read frame from the 3rd DCE of the
RAW exposures taken before and after the thermal anneal (see mips-990_24um.pro). The
images have been scaled linearly from 0 - 5000 DN, and are extremely similar in their
structure. It should be noted that a constant value of 19429 DN were subtracted from
the data from after the anneal, because of the problem with the offset voltage noted
in the abstract. Figure 3 shows the ratio of the after-anneal image to the before-anneal
image. The dark bar across the image is due to a latent image of the pickoff-mirror
edge, which was serendipitously being imaged in the final exposure sequence of mips-950
(CSMM was at the 160 µm dark position, which directs the 24 µm array at one
edge of the pickoff mirror - see Figure 4). It is interesting that the latent, which
is present in the reset-read frame of the RAW exposures, is present only in the region
where the light was bright but unsaturating. There is also some evidence that this
latent decays with a slower timescale than the latents in the slope images. For example,
ratioing the reset-read frame from DCEs 2 and 10 of the before-anneal data does not
show the latent visible in Figure 3. Results
Tepmerature Plots from Anneal
24 µm Images
Figure 1.DN image from the reset-read frame of the 24 µm RAW exposure
taken before the thermal anneal on the Si array. Scaling is 0 - 5000 DN.
Figure 2.DN image from the reset-read frame of the 24 µm RAW exposure
taken after the thermal anneal, same scaling as above.
Figure 3.Ratio of the image in Fig. 2 to Fig. 1 showing the latent from
the pickoff-mirror edge.
Figure 4.Slope image (SUR) from the scattered background test in Campaign C,
where the images were much less saturated, and the pickoff-mirror edge is visible. The
latent artifact visible in Figure 3 coincides with the edge of the pickoff-mirror in
this image, which would be in the same place as in the Campaign B data. NOTE that the
bottom of the image is saturated (0 slope), and the light seen in the upper part of
the image is scattered light (the notch in the pickoff mirror points into the mirror,
i.e. into the more brightly illuminated part). The steep edge of the notch appears
to be at right here, and the sloped part to the left (i.e. the boresight is to the
the left).
Conclusions
The thermal anneal on the 24 µm array worked correctly, but an error in the
IER failed to return the offset voltages on that array to their correct value
after the anneal, resulting in data ramps starting ~19000 DN higher than they
should. The problem will be corrected by Campaign D1. The thermal anneal
cleaned-out the latent image. It is not currently known if the presence of
a latent in the reset-read frame impacts the calibration of the 24 µm
data. To first order things should be OK because everything is done with
slopes, but this might have some subtle interaction with droop or latent
image correction.
Output and Deliverable Products
None.
Actions Following Analysis
None.