// ENTER CAID, CAMPN, and Analyst WITHIN THE QUOTES IN THE FOLLOWING 2 LINES ... $caid="990"; // e.g. $caid = "90"; $campn="D2"; // e.g. $campn = "D2" or $campn = "Q"; $analyst="D. Kelly; J. Stansberry"; // e.g. $analyst="D. Kelly"; // YOU CAN SKIP DOWN TO THE OUTCOME SECTION NOW. include ("IOC_connect.php"); // this line isn't for you include ("IOC_log_fns.php"); // this line isn't for you $db = ioc_db_connect(); $query="select * from ioc_tasks where camp_crnt = '$campn' and caid = $caid limit 1"; $result = mysql_query($query); if (mysql_num_rows($result) != 1) { echo "
Principal: = $princ;?>
Deputy: = $deplist;?>
Analyst: = $analyst;?>
AORKEYS: if (! $aorkeys) {echo "unknown";} else { echo $aorkeys;}?>
Last Updated: if (file_exists($file)) {echo date("D M d Y, H:i:s", filemtime($file) ) ;} ?>
We converted the diagnostic data from the thermal anneal into temperatures and generated temperature plots. These data are compared to the temperature curves from previous anneals. These data are presented in the metatask writeup mips-2050.
We compared the RAW data taken before and after the thermal anneal to look for changes in array behavior. The items of interest were the ramp starting points, the noise levels on the detectors, and the responsivity patterns. The ramp starting point data are presented in the metatask writeup mips-2060.
The data were reduced using mips_sloper with no flags. The PreFlight dark, flat, droop correction, bad pixel mask, and linearity corrections were used. We used the IRAF task qphot with an extraction radius of 6 pixels, with a sky annulus of inner radius 8 pixels and width 5 pixels. This gave us measurements of the mean sky level and of the sky-subtracted flux within the extraction radius. These results are presented below.
filename: mips_IER_7055872_pht_A24_Pukn_pos-1_4s.red.fits DCE MeanSky SkyDev Rad Sum Area SkySubFlux 1 581.7133 24.27886 6.00 354241.4 113.3909 288280.4 2 590.9636 25.50079 6.00 358899.7 113.4585 291849.9 3 594.6772 25.12846 6.00 358721.2 113.4894 291231.6 4 595.5797 25.24756 6.00 358589.6 113.4888 290998. 5 596.0206 26.48041 6.00 358936.1 113.5012 291287. 6 596.686 25.50534 6.00 358537.9 113.5139 290805.7 7 597.1325 24.86123 6.00 358513.2 113.5452 290711.7 8 595.6302 24.84099 6.00 358220.4 113.5716 290573.7 9 599.4079 26.00039 6.00 357988.7 113.5662 289916.2 10 596.5841 25.93758 6.00 358059. 113.5664 290307.1 --- Thermal Anneal happened here --- 11 580.7078 24.65132 6.00 348807.3 113.5409 282873.2 12 591.0038 24.61345 6.00 355926.3 113.4687 288865.9 13 594.4946 25.7216 6.00 359597.8 113.5109 292116.2 14 594.8561 24.27861 6.00 357972.7 113.5195 290444.9 15 595.7899 24.80646 6.00 358704.3 113.5484 291053.3 16 596.7946 25.16226 6.00 359165.7 113.5683 291388.8 17 597.9906 24.90453 6.00 358578.8 113.5589 290671.6 18 599.0444 26.43872 6.00 358104.6 113.5497 290083.2 19 596.9169 26.57643 6.00 358465.7 113.5488 290686.5 20 597.543 25.1375 6.00 358534.8 113.556 290680.2
There are no obvious changes in the sky or source brightnesses following the thermal anneal. Any changes are smaller than the DCE to DCE variation.