// ENTER CAID, CAMPN, and Analyst WITHIN THE QUOTES IN THE FOLLOWING 2 LINES ... $caid="990"; // e.g. $caid = "90"; $campn="E"; // e.g. $campn = "D2" or $campn = "Q"; $analyst="D. Kelly; J. Stansberry"; // e.g. $analyst="D. Kelly"; // YOU CAN SKIP DOWN TO THE OUTCOME SECTION NOW. include ("IOC_connect.php"); // this line isn't for you include ("IOC_log_fns.php"); // this line isn't for you $db = ioc_db_connect(); $query="select * from ioc_tasks where camp_crnt = '$campn' and caid = $caid limit 1"; $result = mysql_query($query); if (mysql_num_rows($result) != 1) { echo "
Principal:
Deputy:
Analyst:
AORKEYS: if (! $aorkeys) {echo "unknown";} else { echo $aorkeys;}?>
Last Updated: if (file_exists($file)) {echo date("D M d Y, H:i:s", filemtime($file) ) ;} ?>
We converted the diagnostic data from the thermal anneal into temperatures and generated temperature plots. These data are compared to the temperature curves from previous anneals. These data are presented in the metatask writeup mips-2050.
We compared the RAW data taken before and after the thermal anneal to look for changes in array behavior. The items of interest were the ramp starting points, the noise levels on the detectors, and the responsivity patterns. The ramp starting point data are presented in the metatask writeup mips-2060.
The data were reduced using mips_sloper with no flags. The PreFlight dark, flat, droop correction, bad pixel mask, and linearity corrections were used. We used the IRAF task qphot with an extraction radius of 6 pixels, with a sky annulus of inner radius 8 pixels and width 5 pixels. This gave us measurements of the mean sky level and of the sky-subtracted flux within the extraction radius. These results are presented below.
filename: mips_IER_7110912_pht_A24_Pukn_pos-1_4s.red.fits DCE MeanSky SkyDev Rad Sum Area SkySubFlux 1 505.7257 22.75022 6.00 347701.4 113.1562 290475.4 2 513.5912 21.78249 6.00 353320.7 113.1725 295196.3 3 518.3794 22.49594 6.00 353669.3 113.1705 295004.1 4 518.5238 20.26164 6.00 353500.7 113.1924 294807.8 5 519.3474 21.49579 6.00 353061.2 113.2096 294266.1 6 519.8422 21.77713 6.00 353203.9 113.2008 294357.3 7 519.9327 21.80017 6.00 352247.8 113.2077 293387.4 8 520.0168 22.05951 6.00 352550.5 113.218 293675.2 9 520.5536 22.0038 6.00 352172.8 113.1901 293251.3 10 520.6093 20.84022 6.00 352733.3 113.1896 293805.7 --- Thermal Anneal happened here --- 11 504.6711 23.46998 6.00 344302.3 113.2532 287146.6 12 515.5959 21.63516 6.00 351604.9 113.2493 293214.1 13 519.4681 21.68307 6.00 353668.6 113.271 294827.9 14 521.0444 22.10491 6.00 353621.5 113.2743 294600.5 15 520.9221 21.78965 6.00 353217.6 113.2715 294211.9 16 522.1057 21.43302 6.00 352607.8 113.2813 293463. 17 521.9291 23.35706 6.00 353802.6 113.2719 294682.7 18 520.8771 22.20086 6.00 353734.5 113.2798 294729.7 19 520.627 21.82721 6.00 353213.1 113.2859 294233.4 20 521.9471 21.31372 6.00 353371. 113.2795 294245.1The sky and sky-subtracted source fluxes are plotted below:
There are no obvious changes in the sky or source brightnesses following the thermal anneal. Any changes are smaller than the DCE to DCE variation.