<? echo "MIPS-$caid, Campaign $campn IOC/SV Analysis"; ?>

There is a problem w/ your write-up. Check that you have valied entries for \$CAID and \$Campn in your analysis.php file. If that checks out, then Contact Stansberry"; return ; } // get first matching task $row = mysql_fetch_array($result); $title = $row["title"]; $princ = $row["principal"]; $deputy= $row["deputy"]; $campn0 = $row["campn0"]; $aorkeys = $row["aorkeys"]; // get real name of principal, deputies $princ = ioc_get_person($princ); $princ = $princ[0]; $deps = explode(",",$deputy); foreach ($deps as $depty) { $depty = trim($depty); $depty = ioc_get_person($depty); $depty = $depty[0]; $depty = explode(",",$depty); $depty = $depty[0]; // last names only $deplist[] = $depty; } $deplist = implode(", ", $deplist); $caid = sprintf("%03d",$caid); $file = "mips-".$caid.$campn.".analysis.php"; // if more matches, append the AORKEYS from those $numrows = mysql_num_rows($result); if ($numrows > 1) { $aorkeys = " " . $numrows . " Task Executions: ". $aorkeys; for ($i=0;$i < mysql_num_rows($result); $i++) { $row = mysql_fetch_array($result); $morekeys = $row["aorkeys"]; $aorkeys = $aorkeys .'; '.$morekeys; } } // END PHP. ?> <? echo "MIPS-$caid, Campaign $campn IOC/SV Analysis"; ?>

Principal:
Deputy:
Analyst:
AORKEYS:
Last Updated:

Task Outcome Summary

DATA STATUS: Anomalous The data was flipped along x axis. This data has an orientation of 180 degrees from the wide field. This is as to be expected from the code-V results. However, the code V results have the 24, 160 and 70 N with 180 degree rotation from the sky to detector and 0 degree rotation for the 70 W. We found that all the wide fields (24, 160 70W) have a 180 rotation from sky to pixels and only the 70 N has 0 degree rotation (resulting from difference optical path).
TASK OUTCOME: Nominal

Abstract

Before carrying out the focal plane survey for 70 µm NF (campaign I), we want to check the suitability of the targets. They should not be saturated, too weak, or obviously extended. The S/N in one 3 sec integration should be good, > 30. We have 3 candidates for the 70 µm wide field. We will execute 1 small field AOT per source, with 3 sec integrations. We used that data from this task along with the 70 micron first light data to do a "pre-coarse" focal plane survey. We centroided the data using IPD3 and created a CA file with the centroided data sent this file to the instrument pointing frame (IPF) team. The quality of the data (one side bad) prevented us from using the centroiding program written for the FPS.
The location of the MIPS instrument frames are found in the frame tables and are given as brown angles. The IPF team determines corrections to the Brown Angles based on the centroids the MIPS team sends them.The results of the IPF team from this task are in report ID01P118.pdf

The results from the IPF team recommended the following changes to the brown angles for the prime frame : delta_theta_Y (0.1925 arc minutes), delta_theta_Z (2.103819 arc minutes), delta_angle (-0.000071 degrees). The IPF team gave an accuracy of the locating the 70 micron narrow prime frame center as 2.0543 arc seconds. The requirement was 1.12 arc seconds after the coarse survey. The large change (> 2 arc minutes) in the theta_Z has caused concern. These was some concern that the mirror motion in this AOT was incorrect so frame table 9 did not include these changes. We wanted to wait until we got more data. After SED data from campaign I showed a 1.5 arc minute change in the theta_z it was discovered that for SED mode and 70 micron Narrow the mirror is commanded so as not to run into the hard stops. However the frame tables were built thinking that the mirror were commanded so that they were centered about the 70 micron N (SED) mode. Once we understood why we had a large theta_Z change we went ahead and update the 70 N frames in Frame table update 10. The resulting frame table 10 contained the following changes:

For a complete summary of frame table updates see : Frame Table Updates: Meta task 2080

Analysis

The data was calibrated by using mips_sloper and mips_caler and calibration files provided for this campaign. This data was centroided using IDP3.

Results

We found a suitable star for the focal planes surveys. We got a bonus with this data because we were able to send it to the IPF team who gave us a recommendation for the brown angles. The change is theta_Z proved to be large so we decided to wait until get got more data since there was confusion if the mirror moves where correct for this AOT (later Cam J we found they were). We made the recommended changes this task found in Frame Table Update 10.

The results of the IPF team are in report ID01P118.pdf

The comments from the IPF report ID01P118.dat are as follows:

Conclusions

Updated Frame Table 10.

Output and Deliverable Products

CA and CS files were passed to the IPF team

Actions Following Analysis

Updated Frame Table 10.